This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 733–750, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.65
Figure 1: Preparation process of magnetic antidot arrays. After self-assembly of a monolayer monodisperse PS ...
Figure 2: SEM image of Fe antidot array with a period a = 200 nm, an antidot diameter d = 125 nm and a thickn...
Figure 3: Exemplary set of minor loops for 61 reversal fields Hr with ΔHr = 2 Oe from which the FORC density ...
Figure 4: Field profile adapted to minor loop measurements with MOKE. Part 3 and 4 (green and red) are used f...
Figure 5: (a) In-plane hysteresis loops of 20 nm thick Fe antidot arrays with constant period of a = 200 nm a...
Figure 6: Domain pattern of hexagonal Fe antidot arrays with lattice parameter a = 200 nm and hole diameter d...
Figure 7: (a) Schematics of the sample geometry for AMR measurements. The red and blue arrows indicate the di...
Figure 8: Measured AMR curves (a) for the current direction along nearest neighbours (nn) and (b) next neares...
Figure 9: Micromagnetic simulation of hysteresis curves corresponding to the AMR measurements. Hysteresis of ...
Figure 10: (a) Longitudinal and (b) polar Kerr hysteresis loops with an in-plane magnetic field applied along ...
Figure 11: Fe L3 edge XMCD contrast of X-ray micrographs under normal incidence of a hexagonal antidot lattice...
Figure 12: Major hysteresis loops and FORC diagrams of two hexagonal antidot lattices in out-of-plane magnetiz...
Figure 13: Left image: XMCD image of a 43 nm thin FeGd film with antidot diameter of 165 nm and centre-to-cent...